With Interconnected Nature: Internet for Bacteria, I have taken the chance to give the imaginative process a more relevant space over the outcome as an art piece. In the sense of collecting and creating interdisciplinary knowledge that will shape a project that, being feasible as a scientific research project, for instance, crosses and questions the anthropocentric boundaries that require for it to be fictional.

​

It entangles diverse methodologies and processes that allow the project to interconnect with different emerging biocentric narratives while aiming to contribute to them too. The main ones refer to methodologies to design a scientific experiment and the biotechnologies and resources required to carry it out and, on the other side, the fictional, not less real, narratives that appear and intertwine when the project speaks for non-human centered digital biotechnologies.

​

Speculative Fabulation (Haraway, 2016) allows me to dialogue with the technological possibilities of the ongoing underdevelopment media of biocomputing while re-arranging the narratives and metaphors. I find fascinating Haraways’ thoughts and proposals about the worlding power of scientific knowledge and narratives, and I seek for the transformation of these last ones to be my creative practice.

​

Marta de Menezes’s proposal for the Moon’s moon project opens an amazing conversation on how to give space to the research, imagining, and shaping of a project as an artistic outcome in itself. In her words: “This project explores the idea that a body of knowledge can be developed as an artwork. It consists in collecting and eventually exhibiting information about the creation of a near impossible art- object.”(De Menezes, 2021)

​

Methodologies on how to deal with “near impossible” artistic mediation can also approach the Aesthetics of the impossible, proposed by Iliana Hernández (2019) or the Epistemology of impossibility or Science of indetermination by Carlos Maldonado (2021b). There, indisciplinary creative practices beyond the already-known or understood as feasible are more than relevant to create our experience of the world while creating the world itself. Creating in such a context is not to determine an outcome but to open the chance for possibilities to emerge.

​

All in all, indiscilplinarity allows the inter/intra action of a plurality of methodologies. In-discipline speaks for the non-existence of defined disciplines and at the same time, similarly to the word in Spanish, undisciplined, a lack of disciplined behavior.